spellcheckman's Blog

Wasn't it homeland security that was suppose to investigate economical corruption? What happen?

Man, you had to bring up homeland security!

They're all hanging around at the airports checking people's shoes and baby formula.

And then they're updating the no-fly list. They still haven't figured out how to get a few lawmakers off the list, and the one Air Force fighter pilot off it. No one quite knows who to call about the list, how it is kept, who keeps it, how many people are on it, or how to make amendments to it.

And then homeland security is going over everyone's bank statements looking for transactions over $10,000.

And, if there's any time, they might hang around all the water treatment plants, the Canadian border, I mean the Mexican border-----Canadiens like their free health care, I think they hang around the Canadian border to keep the American's here! And then homeland security is checking every one of the metal containers in Houston, Long Beach and every port on the East coast for fake Chinese handbags.

But, to answer your question, the SEC goes after corruption when they detect it, not someone else detecting it. If someone else points it out and they act on it.......they can't claim it as their idea and then the "other" people look smarter than them. That is unacceptable in government work.

Please, no more homeland security questions. Just keep it to individual research to prevent yourself from fraud.

As a federal prosecutor, Chertoff investigated and personally prosecuted significant cases of political corruption, organized crime, and corporate fraud. Among them was the “Mafia Commission” case, in which the leaders of La Cosa Nostra were all convicted and sentenced to 100 years in prison for directing the criminal activities of the American Mafia.
http://www.dhs.gov/xabout/structure/biography_0116.shtm


He was productive as a federal prosecutor, instead of head of Homeland security.