By Bill O'Reilly
This is a Paul Revere alert.
The New York Times actually did me a favor by implying that I am a racist
and a white supremacist guy. The far-left paper attacked me because I
understand their true agenda — and it has nothing to do with helping the poor.
It has everything to do with amassing power and changing the political
structure in America
by using illegal immigrants.
As we reported Monday night, The Times wants blanket amnesty for illegal
aliens already in this country, and the paper wants their extended families to
join them in the USA
as well. That would swell the voting rolls by tens of millions, the vast
majority of new voters joining the Democratic Party because that's where the
entitlements are.
On May 4, 2007, The Times
editorialized:
"Closing the door to families (of migrants) would be unjust and
unworkable, and a mockery of the values that conservatives profess. It would
only encourage illegality by forcing people to choose between their loved ones
and the law."
It is very touching that The Times cares so much about illegality when it
has supported sanctuary city policies and lax immigration enforcement, isn't
it? This whole caring for the downtrodden deal is a ruse, a scam, a con. What
The New York Times wants for the country is what has happened in California.
Forty years ago the Golden State
was fertile ground for Republicans and conservatives. Richard Nixon, Ronald
Reagan and Pete Wilson all prospered out there. In fact, in 1968 Nixon beat
Humphrey 48 to 45 in California.
Last November, Obama beat McCain 61 to 37, a huge landslide.
In 1970, nine percent of California's
population was foreign born. Now it is an astounding 28 percent, and most of
the new voters are Democrats.
So the Dems now control power in California.
It is a virtual one-party state — its 55 electoral votes a lock for the
Democrats.
New York is almost a one-party
state, that's 31 electoral votes. Illinois,
controlled by Democrats, another 21 electoral votes.
Get the picture?
If blanket amnesty is passed, the Democratic ranks in places like Colorado,
Arizona, Nevada
and Florida will explode, putting
our two-party system in jeopardy. That's exactly what The Times envisions.
And guess who is also a big blanket amnesty guy? Hey, there, George Soros.
The far-left billionaire has donated big money to open border groups.
And then there's the ACLU, actively working against many laws that constrain
illegal immigration, and opposing strict border enforcement.
So let's add this up. The Times, Soros, the ACLU. Quite a lineup.
If these people succeed in getting blanket amnesty passed for illegals and
their families living abroad, the political system in America
will change forever.
That's why The Times has branded me a racist — because I have unmasked them.
They can't deny it, so they trot out the smear machine. A very troubling
situation.
