WVBT Blog Landing Page
 

Jordan's Blog

by Jordan from KC

Last Post 161 days, 3 hours Ago


Fox-4 reported on a story about Kansas City teens sexting: sending nude pictures of themselves to boyfriends via their cell phones. Parents should be alert. The way Missouri laws are written these teens could be charged with promoting child pornography. Under Missouri law the mere possession of child pornography is a crime. The boyfriend who merely receives it and keeps it stored on his cell phone is technically in possession of child pornography and could also be charged. If he shares it with someone else and/or sends it out to someone, he too is promoting and distributing child pornography. Parents might want to familiarize themselves and their teens with Missouri Revised Statutes 573.023, 573.025, 573.035 and 573.037.

 

I know. There are parents who will read this and say that will never happen to my child, or that no prosecutor is going to prosecute kids for just horsing around. Don’t be too sure. Some prosecutor may want to make a name for himself or herself and decide to do a test case. Even if he or she is not successful, the patents of the kids involved are going end up spending some big bucks on attorney fees defending their teen.

 

But also of concern, possibly more so than the possibility of prosecution, is what happens to these photographs once they get out into cyberspace where they can live forever. With the various programs available to manipulate photographs, that simple nude photo can become something entirely different once it finds its way into the hands of some imaginative person. A few years down the road when your son or daughter is trying to launch a career their foolish photographic misadventure might just pop back up. How many stories have you read about or seen on the news where some political figure, prominent person or celebrity suddenly finds that an embarrassing photograph taken years earlier is being made public?

 

This is something that every parent should really think about and discuss with their children.

22 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 22
Page 1 of 2
1
Last
vision read my blog
Jan 5, 2009 | 10:45 PM

Extremely dangerous game, not only for their future in finding a job and possibly having their picture posted on the Internet, but these children obviously do know the dangers of criminals looking for them. In mature children should not own cell phones with picture capabilities or have texting. Again, it is parents making poor judgements about their children's welfare and safety. They wonder why children are disappearing from the face of the earth, kidnappings and being sold as a sex slave is not inconceivable, is it?

vision read my blog
Jan 5, 2009 | 10:47 PM

Sorry "Inmature"

redhotz read my blog
Jan 6, 2009 | 12:38 AM

Once again, this comes down to parenting and the time for parents to step up to the plate. Call it an invasion of privacy, say I don't trust my child/children, or that they weren't mature enough, but when we gave our children cell phones, strict guidelines were put on usage of the phone. We have access to the phones at any time. At no time will there be any passwords or ways to lock them for privacy reasons. We find something unacceptable, you're done, it's gone. Pretty cut and dry if you ask me. They both got their first cell phones at age 11. 5 and 1 year later, we've had no problems. Our theory is that if you're doing nothing wrong, and you have nothing to hide, then there will be no reason for us not to take a look, read your text messages, etc. Vision, you make a good point. Why does society wonder how awful things happen to young people when so many go unsupervised. And all the excuses in the world do not make up for parents being absent because they are busy with their own lives. To those parents I say "Maybe you should have reconsidered having children"

BeStrong read my blog view my photos
Jan 6, 2009 | 9:11 AM

Redhotz- remember there is a delete button so they could still be sexting and you would never be the wiser. If you have unlimited text then you don't know how many texts are sent. Not saying they are but there are ways of getting around a parent who checks their phone.

mnaines read my blog view my photos
Jan 6, 2009 | 12:28 PM

BeStrong, my solution to that is this: If you don't want your teen sexting, then don't allow them to have text message capability in the first place. If you don't want them sexting, don't give them a cell phone with a camera on it.

RabidAnglophile read my blog
Jan 6, 2009 | 12:32 PM

my 13 y/o niece (because she has a good, trusting relationship with her parents)reported to her mom and dad that one of her "friends" (a boy) had texted her and asked her to use her cell phone to send him a naked pix of herself. She was highly embarrassed, but told them anyway. Needless to say, her parents got right on the phone to this kid's parents and the boy. I hope he got a good A$$ whoopin'. That being said, I still think it is insane for these kids to constantly text one another throughout the day and night. I wonder if half these kids will ever learn good one on one communicating skills. But, my niece's parents are constantly checking out their vibrating phones for messages even while visiting Mom and Dad. Epitome of rudeness in my book.

purdygirl read my blog view my photos
Jan 6, 2009 | 2:38 PM

I am vometing in my mouth as I type this but I have to agree with mnaines on this one.

DogJ read my blog
Jan 6, 2009 | 3:05 PM

Even a blind squirrel can find an acorn! Yes, mnaines finally hits a nail squarely on the head.
Unless the child has a jod and is paying for the service themselves, the parents have full control over what their kids have. If the kids are spending allowance to pay for such services, their allowance is too high.

Busybee read my blog
Jan 6, 2009 | 5:54 PM

I agree DogJ and Redholtz!

Busybee read my blog
Jan 6, 2009 | 5:54 PM

I agree DogJ and Redholtz!

ClickChick read my blog view my photos
Jan 7, 2009 | 1:57 PM

And for those of you who feel you're child just has to have a phone (we got along fine without them), you can now pay a little extra a month and restrict who your child can text/call to just you and family members and 911.

mnaines read my blog view my photos
Jan 7, 2009 | 4:46 PM

ClickChick, I'm not saying take away their phones altogether, I'm saying take away the text messaging and camera abilities. Allow them to still call people, just don't let them text people.

originalmo_trucker read my blog
Jan 8, 2009 | 2:22 PM

Unfortunately some parents show almost as much lack of discretion as thier children when it comes to the level of "freedom" they give to thier children (particularly pre and early teens).

If I had a child who needed a cell phone, I definitely wouldn't get them one with a camera function (or allow them use of a digital camera or computer at home without supervision). A few years ago there was a cell phone on the market that only had three buttons, besides the call and hang up ones. One was pre-programmed with 9-11 and the other two you (the parent) programmed by either using your computer or sending a message via another cell phone to your service provider. The targeted marketing group was parents with younger children who wanted to be able to contact thier children, and to limit who the child could call. Maybe this is what parents need to be looking at instead of being concerned with what Johnny and Suzie are texting or photo sharing with each other.

originalmo_trucker read my blog
Jan 8, 2009 | 2:37 PM

As to the issue of "child porn", the big problem many people don't even realize is that producing, promoting or possessing it is not only a crime under state statutes it is also a crime under Federal statutes and International Treaty! So, if Johnny or Suzie sends a sex message or photo across state or international lines it is a crime at a higher level of government, and could result in much more severe penalties and long sentencing.

Oh, by the way, most cell phone providers will supply subscribers with a list of all text and photo messages, even those that have been "deleted", via the internet. The service will cost you, of course, but if you have a child that you suspect of doing something improper the cost might well be worth it. (The reason why you can do this is that Congress enacted legislation requiring internet and cell phone providers to keep records of all activity, due to fears about terrorism or other criminal activities. Thanks, "Big Brother"!)

jhhwingnut read my blog
Jan 8, 2009 | 2:47 PM

I'm just hoping I receive some "wrong number's" from some college girl's....mmmmm LOL...

Seriously, I agree with originalmo_trucker....there's so so many parent's out there that have "0" control over their kid's.....alot of them can't even get their kid's to phone home if they're going to be late....let alone dictate what they do with their phone's.....but good luck tryin'....!!!

jturner30 read my blog
Jan 8, 2009 | 5:52 PM

Technology is good to a certain point,but with anything there are going to be people who miss use it.Kids are growing up way too fast.That old saying,"Kids will be kids".Now days kids are still kids they just have the means to act out what they think are adult behaviors.If you are going to allow your child to have a cell phone make sure they understand the responsibility and consequences of their actions.We must educate first,before the education comes in the form of a hard lesson.Never have the attitude,"It won't or can't happen to my kid."Anything is possible.

mnaines read my blog view my photos
Jan 9, 2009 | 12:35 PM

Jturner, I feel "hard lessons" are better in this case, because that is the only way people are really going to learn. I was raised by parents who felt the same way, with my father saying things like "You wanna stick your finger in that light socket, go right ahead. Hurts don't it? Maybe you won't do it again next time." I feel the same way about the idiots who think they own the road - let them drive like idiots...When they crash, it becomes an "I told you so" moment, and if that does not teach them to drive carefully, then nothing ever will.

jturner30 read my blog
Jan 9, 2009 | 11:36 PM

I agree,hard lessons are sometimes the best way to learn a lesson.But when it involves children and sexual actions the consequences may be something no one is prepared to deal with.There are too many pervert's out there to take chances with kids safety.Like the crazy driving scenario,that would be fine but all too often other people are hurt as a result of one reckless person's actions.

originalmo_trucker read my blog
Jan 10, 2009 | 3:30 PM

What has had me was the parents who complained about the teachers or administrators who have caught students "sexting". I'm sorry but, DUHHH! If I was a teacher and one of my students was passing around a cell phone showing off a message or photo I would want to see what they had, and admonish them about it. (Even if all it had to do with was thier use of a cell phone during school hours.) Afterall, I can recall my fair share of the teacher taking a "pass it on" note away from myself or one of my classmates and then getting on to us about it. Technology might change, but people never do.

mnaines read my blog view my photos
Jan 10, 2009 | 10:48 PM

Originalmo, when I was in middle school, the teachers would take those notes and read them out loud to the whole class, thoroughly and immediately humiliating the person who wrote the note. They very quickly learned not to pass notes in the class.

Page 1 of 2
1
Last


Write your comment below:




Jordan

Retired Law Enforcement.

Member Since: 9/29/2006