WVBT Blog Landing Page
 

Chickenkiller's Blog

by Chickenkiller from Fashionable West County

Last Post 486 days, 3 hours Ago


Only 38% of Dems claim excellent mental health
Results of Gallup poll no shock to shrink who authored book on liberal madness

 


6:43 pm Eastern  © 2008 WorldNetDaily

 

 

 

When the Gallup pollsters asked Americans what they thought about their own mental health, they were intrigued by the difference between Democrats and Republicans.

 

 

 

While 58 percent of Republicans reported having excellent mental health, only 38 percent of Democrats described themselves that way.

 

 

 

The study was no surprise to D. Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr., a noted psychiatrist and author of a controversial book that makes the clinical case liberalism is a mental illness.

 

 

 

"Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded," says Dr. Lyle Rossiter, author of the new book, "The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness." "Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave."

 

 

 

While political activists on the other side of the spectrum have made similar observations, Rossiter boasts professional credentials and a life virtually free of activism and links to "the vast right-wing conspiracy."

 

 

 

For more than 35 years he has diagnosed and treated more than 1,500 patients as a board-certified clinical psychiatrist and examined more than 2,700 civil and criminal cases as a board-certified forensic psychiatrist. He received his medical and psychiatric training at the University of Chicago.

 

 

 

Rossiter says the kind of liberalism being displayed by the two major candidates for the Democratic Party presidential nomination can only be understood as a psychological disorder.

 

 

 

"A social scientist who understands human nature will not dismiss the vital roles of free choice, voluntary cooperation, and moral integrity – as liberals do," he says. "A political leader who understands human nature will not ignore individual differences in talent, drive, personal appeal, and work ethic, and then try to impose economic and social equality on the population – as liberals do. And a legislator who understands human nature will not create an environment of rules which over-regulates and over-taxes the nation's citizens, corrupts their character, and reduces them to wards of the state – as liberals do."

 

 

 

Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population by:

 

v      creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization;

 

v      satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence, and compensation;

 

v      augmenting primitive feelings of envy;

 

v      rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government.

 

 

 

"The roots of liberalism – and its associated madness – can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the liberal mind," he says. "When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains, and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious."

 

 

 

By the way, the Gallup poll conducted late last year also found only 43 percent of independents describe themselves as in excellent mental health. While Rossiter thinks he understands the discrepancy in the state of mental health between Democrats and Republicans, the Gallup pollsters could only scratch their heads.

 

 

 

"The reason the relationship exists between being a Republican and more positive mental health is unknown, and one cannot say whether something about being a Republican causes a person to be more mentally healthy or whether something about being mentally healthy causes a person to choose to become a Republican," the study concluded.

 

 

 

34 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 34
Page 1 of 2
1
Last
bubba-right-wing read my blog view my photos
Mar 5, 2008 | 11:01 PM

This is one of the best blogs, if not the best. I have not been here long and this is great. Dang I was going to bed, but now I have to study this. Thanks

JustWonderin read my blog view my photos
Mar 6, 2008 | 8:37 AM

Interesting, chickenkiller. Good to see you posting.

bubba-right-wing read my blog view my photos
Mar 6, 2008 | 10:21 AM

Well, again I know which party I identify more with. Lately since the take over by Democrats in the House and Senate, we hear the liberal cry, the "sky is falling". People still do not get it, you do get what you wish for sometimes. One of Roanald Reagans qualities was making Americans feel proud and good again about being Americans. So, the leading Liberal candidates wife says she never felt proud till now. All jabs and kidding aside, life is a state of mind, stay positive, feel more of the good than bad, and WORK for success, and good things will happen.

Mutatis-Mutandis read my blog
Mar 6, 2008 | 11:13 PM

LOL, and I'm serious, this made me laugh. This whole idea of liberalism as a mental disorder is insane in itslef. What a bunch of BS.

bubba-right-wing read my blog view my photos
Mar 7, 2008 | 9:46 AM

Are you sure???????????? Free Healthcare from Hard Working Americans could be here soon. So make that call and see how you really are.

bubba-right-wing read my blog view my photos
Mar 7, 2008 | 10:00 AM

To Chickenkiller. Not many comments yet, and I think I know why, maybe. Do crazy, depressed people know they are? Afraid the report is true and see themselves for what they are? No, that would mean they have a brain. Since the Democrats started the big FIGHT amongest themselves, since Texas, I can not contain myself. I will have fun for months. It has been proven the two people they have has split the party in two and now will fight to take control. That is what they get, when hard working labor was their voice, and let it turn into what they have now. FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT

unklehenry read my blog
Mar 7, 2008 | 2:32 PM

Cartman forever .....

Mutatis-Mutandis read my blog
Mar 7, 2008 | 5:43 PM

I think most of the posters aren't responding to this because it isn't worth responding to, as it is a bunch of crap.

Now excuse my while I strip bare BLEEP naked and spread my own poop on the walls.

bubba-is-right read my blog
Mar 7, 2008 | 8:36 PM

I just finished talking with my twin brother,Bubba right wing. He said he will settle down and will be a good boy. I am not sure if he really means it though. Thanks

Fishboy read my blog
Mar 8, 2008 | 10:09 PM

If you belive this crap then your a realy sick mental case..

If you delete it just proves you are a commie because that is what commies do get rid of anyone who does not think like they do...

Chickenkiller read my blog
Mar 10, 2008 | 10:57 PM

mutatis - since you are a college student in the realm of the partially educated I'll give you a pass. Even I was a liberal in college, for about 2 semesters. I think we had this discussion elsewhere along the line.

fishboy - nope, I'm not into deletions. I'd just as soon let you shine through and display your ignorance in your own posting. Evidently you are clueless as to what comprises a communist.

Mutatis-Mutandis read my blog
Mar 11, 2008 | 2:23 AM

Chickenkiller, I am curious, how did you come by your name?

Chickenkiller read my blog
Mar 11, 2008 | 4:38 PM

mutatis - if I told you all the mistique would be gone. It all happened 34 years ago, and has been upgraded onto a Windows platform and is still in use to this day. It makes use of a nutritionist and the standard deviation bell curve (and you know just how much you liberals hate the concept of the bell curve). Nuff said!

Mutatis-Mutandis read my blog
Mar 14, 2008 | 10:31 PM

don't know what the bell curve is. Don't really care to know. I just assumed you took a sadistic pleasure in killing an innocent animal.

littlebow2000 read my blog view my photos
Apr 23, 2008 | 4:54 PM

Chickenkiller, your comments as to fuel consumption in the U.S. did not cover the consumption but just refinery yield. There you are wrong and my 65% of fuel usage in the United States is right.
You my quote numbers from the DOE, but be sure you quote them right. Give all the facts not just the numbers you made up.
As to your stupid ideas and self centered views. I feel you are a Nut and should be put into an institution if your not already there and writing your blogs from one.

newlylocal read my blog
Apr 25, 2008 | 10:29 AM

Ckickenkiller, I didn't think conservatives believe in mental disorders, or global warming, or poor people.

Legolas read my blog view my photos
May 16, 2008 | 7:41 PM

How true CK! ... these are the same retards that voted vore McGovern...Mondale...Carter...talk about litany of losers....

Saloonatic
May 31, 2008 | 8:36 AM

Conservatism vs Liberalism

by Mark Richardson 1999

One of the great choices in life is between conservatism and liberalism. This choice is not just about politics, but about the way we see the world and the values we hold.

Unfortunately, we are rarely given the information we need to make this choice intelligently. It is especially rare to get the information from a conservative point of view.

This essay aims to fill the gap. Hopefully it will make clear for the reader the most basic features of both conservatism and liberalism, and the significance of the differences between them.


Chapter 1. What is Liberalism?

Liberalism is made of up several elements, including individualism, rationalism and linear progress.

Individualism

Sometimes the word individualism is used in the same sense as individuality: the rejection of conformism to create an individual style or personality. Individualism in this sense would be supported by both liberals and conservatives.

The term liberal individualism, though, means something quite distinct. It refers to the belief of liberals in a certain kind of individual autonomy. In short liberals believe that human freedom depends on individuals being subject only to their own reason and will, so that individuals are left free to create themselves in any direction.

This belief has been asserted strongly in Western societies ever since the Renaissance. For instance, the fifteenth century writer Pico della Mirandola once imagined God saying to man

Saloonatic
May 31, 2008 | 8:37 AM

"You, constrained by no limits, in accordance with your own free will ... shall ordain for yourself the limits of your nature ... We have made you ... so that with freedom of choice, as though the maker and moulder of yourself, you may fashion yourself in whatever shape you shall prefer."

In order for individuals to be "self-created" in this fashion, liberals have to clear a path for the exclusive operation of individual reason and will. Usually this involves:-

(i) An assumption that the individual starts out as a blank slate, without anything inborn to limit or give a natural direction to individual behaviour.

and

(ii) A rejection of forms of identity and authority which can't be shaped by individual reason or will.

Conservatives are opposed to liberals on both of these points. Firstly, for conservatives it is simply untrue that individuals start out as a blank slate. Instead, conservatives believe that individuals are heavily influenced by an inborn human nature. This human nature is flawed, intricate and difficult to shift. Much of the effort of society is to draw out the finer qualities of this nature, whilst discouraging the worst.

Secondly, conservatives don't reject forms of identity and authority simply because they aren't chosen by individual reason or will. Conservatives have often found themselves attempting to "conserve" such forms of identity and authority because of their value to individuals or to society. Specific examples of this are given in the next chapter on conservative belief; in general, though, conservatives would argue that rather

Saloonatic
May 31, 2008 | 8:39 AM

conservatives would argue that rather than creating human freedom, the liberal approach tends to undermine the social framework and erode important forms of human "connectedness".

Rationalism

As already mentioned, liberals only wish to accept what has been validated by individual reason. This forms the basis of liberal rationalism: the idea that we come to our beliefs and knowledge of the world through abstract reason, i.e. through the "analytical intellect" alone.

Conservatives are critical of certain aspects of liberal rationalism, especially when it is crudely applied.

This is because abstract reason is really only able to deal with a small part of human experience. It is unable to adequately recognise many of the finer, more subtle and more intangible qualities of life.

How can you, for instance, validate through abstract reason such qualities as love and beauty, or nobility and honour, or whimsy and fancy?

At its worst, liberal rationalism has applied rigid "machine principles" to human life. For instance, the French utopian reformer Charles Fourier once calculated that humans should live in phalanxes of exactly 1620 people. The British utilitarians believed that they could scientifically calculate morality according to a balance of outcomes. And the German Bauhaus architects went so far as to define a house as a "machine for living in".

Another conservative complaint against rationalism is that it sometimes leaves liberals curiously dependent on abstract ideology. There are times when liberals cannot simply accept the most natural and healthy of h

Page 1 of 2
1
Last


Write your comment below:




Chickenkiller

I'm a new user who hasn’t written a bio yet.

Member Since: 9/17/2007