Jan 27, 2009 | 11:55 AM
Category:
News
CAIRO, Egypt (AP) - President Barack Obama on Tuesday chose an Arabic
satellite TV network for his first formal television interview as
president, delivering a message to the Muslim world that "Americans are
not your enemy."
The interview underscored Obama's commitment to repair relations with
the Muslim world that have suffered under the previous administration.
The president expressed an intention to engage the Middle East
immediately and his new envoy to the region, former Sen. George J.
Mitchell, was expected to arrived in Egypt on Tuesday for a visit that
will also take him to Israel, the West Bank, Jordan, Turkey and Saudi
Arabia.
"My job to the Muslim world is to communicate that the Americans are
not your enemy," Obama told the Saudi-owned, Dubai-based Al-Arabiya
news channel.
Obama said the U.S. had made mistakes in the past but "that the same
respect and partnership that America had with the Muslim world as
recently as 20 or 30 years ago, there's no reason why we can't restore
that."
During his presidency, former President George W. Bush gave several
interviews to Al-Arabiya but the wars he launched in Iraq and
Afghanistan prompted a massive backlash against the U.S. in the Muslim
world.
Al-Arabiya has scored interviews with top U.S. officials in the past, including Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.
The Saudi-owned channel is seen by some in Washington as more balanced
in its coverage than its Qatar-funded rival Al-Jazeera, which the
previous White House administration complained had an anti-American
bias.
Obama called for a new partnership with the Muslim world "based on
mutual respect and mutual interest." He talked about growing up in
Indonesia, the Muslim world's most populous nation, and noted that he
has Muslim relatives.
The new president said he felt it was important to "get engaged right
away" in the Middle East and had directed Mitchell to talk to "all the
major parties involved." His administration would craft an approach
after that, he said in the interview.
"What I told him is start by listening, because all too often the
United States starts by dictating," Obama told the interviewer.
The president reiterated the U.S. commitment to Israel as an ally and
to its right to defend itself. But he suggested that both Israel and
the Palestinians have hard choices to make.
"I do believe that the moment is ripe for both sides to realize that
the path that they are on is one that is not going to result in
prosperity and security for their people," he said, calling for a
Palestinian state that is contiguous with internal freedom of movement
and can trade with neighboring countries.
Obama also said that recent statements and messages issued by the
al-Qaida terror network suggest they do not know how to deal with his
new approach.
"They seem nervous," he told the interviewer. "What that tells me is that their ideas are bankrupt."
In his latest message on Jan. 14, al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden said
Obama had been left with a "heavy inheritance" of Bush's wars.
Shortly after the election, the network's number two, Ayman al-Zawahri
used a demeaning racial term for a black American who does the bidding
of whites to describe Obama.
The message suggested the terror network was worried Obama could undermine its rallying cry that the U.S. is an enemy oppressor.
Jan 27, 2009 | 11:11 AM
Category:
News
1. The earliest Spring
in US history has arrived
2. A sculpture of President
Obama has magically appeared on Mount Rushmore
3. Obama has started
the first real full-time job in his life (He was a part-time state legislator,
part-time law professor, and part-time US Senator when he wasn’t
running for President-Don’t mention his “community organizing”
job-trust me-you don’t want to go there.)
4. There is now nothing
above Obama’s pay grade
5. I have decided to
support Obama, but not his presidency. (I’m an Iraqi war vet-If
the liberals can support me but not my mission, then I can support Obama
but not his mission)
6. Michelle Obama is
proud of her country for the second time in her adult life
7. Al Sharpton is no
longer the spokesman for Black America (this one is for real, fortunately)
8. Obama has devised
a clever plan to get Hillary out of the country (this one is for real
too)
9. People in wheelchairs
who make eye contact with Obama can now walk
10. The US tax code
has been simplified enough that Obama’s own appointees can now understand
it and pay their taxes
11. The plumbing problem
under my sink that I was afraid to call a plumber about and hoping it
would fix itself, has fixed itself
12. My chronic shyness
has disappeared
13. Governor Blago
has become ethical
14. The obnoxious ShamWow
guy is off my television set
15. White guilt in
America has disappeared. I am free at last to be a typical white person.
16. Chuck Norris has
cried for the first time ever
17. New Orleans has
finished rebuilding. But they still have a dumb mayor. Obama is working
on this.
18. Brett Favre has
retired sparing us from another teary-eyed news conferences from a grown
man (I can only hope)
19. Never before seen
home movie footage of Paris Hilton has been found
20. The magic force
fields created by the Gun-Free Zone signs around our schools have started
to work
21. Dick Cheney has
returned to the 9th level of Hell
22. Left wing protestors
have started looking for gainful employment
23. Cigarettes and
second-hand smoke no longer cause cancer
24. The Obama’s
have found a church that isn’t Afro-Leninist and prejudiced
25. Obama has kicked
the Detroit Lions out of the NFL
Jan 26, 2009 | 3:06 PM
Category:
Faith
- Hey! It’s my turn to sit in the front pew.
- I was so enthralled, I never noticed your sermon went 25 minutes over time.
- Personally I find witnessing much more enjoyable than golf.
- I’ve decided to give our church the $500 a month I used to send to TV evangelists.
- I volunteer to be the permanent teacher for the Junior High Sunday School class.
- Forget the denominational minimum salary, let’s pay our pastor so he can live like we do.
- I love it when we sing hymns I’ve never heard before!
- Since we’re all here, let’s start the service early.
- Pastor, we’d like to send you to this Bible seminar in the Bahamas.
- Nothing inspires me and strengthens my commitment like our annual stewardship campaign!
Jan 26, 2009 | 1:23 PM
Category:
News
:)
Jan 26, 2009 | 12:25 PM
Category:
Political
;)
Jan 26, 2009 | 12:07 PM
Category:
News
how NOT tot talk to a cop -
CLICK ME
Jan 26, 2009 | 11:59 AM
Category:
Faith
Jan 24, 2009 | 12:57 PM
Category:
News
Jan 22, 2009 | 1:37 PM
Category:
Faith
"She Wasn't Driving Like a Christian," Says Driver Who Rammed Car
A driver who rammed another car at high speed outside San Antonio
last week told police that Jesus had told him to do so because the
other motorist was not "driving like a Christian."
In my
experience, He is usually satisfied if you just give a lousy driver the
finger, but in this case I guess that wouldn't have gotten the message
across.
According to a news release from the county sheriff's
office, the driver told first responders that the driver of the other
vehicle "was not driving like a Christian and it was Jesus' will for
him to punish the car." He similarly told a policeman that "God said
she wasn't driving right, and she needed to be taken off the road."
The Lord does work in mysterious ways.
The man claimed he had
reached 100 mph before hitting the other car with his pickup, although
it doesn't seem that police were able to confirm that. The two cars
did end up in the median and were heavily damaged, but the fact that
neither driver was seriously injured suggests that the man might have
been exaggerating. On the other hand, it was a rear-end collision, so
the effective closing speed might have been much less.
A police
lieutenant had a different explanation for why there were no injuries.
"God must have been with them," he said, "because any other time, the
severity of this crash, it would have been a fatal [crash]." Well, we
know God was with at least one of them, but maybe He really was trying
to help rather than holding down the gas pedal.
The man did not say what the other driver had allegedly been doing that caused him to smite her.
Jan 22, 2009 | 12:16 PM
Category:
News
Pa. man considered bank error ‘a gift from God’Bank error put more than $175,000 in couple's account; pair moved to Fla. from the
AP wire
BLOOMSBURG, Pa. - A Pennsylvania man said he
considered it divine providence when a bank error put more than
$175,000 in his and his wife's account.Fifty-year-old
Randy Pratt and 36-year-old Melissa Pratt face trial in Columbia County
Court on felony theft and conspiracy charges. They waived a preliminary
hearing Wednesday.
The
trouble started when a $1,772.50 deposit to the Pratts' FNB Bank
account showed up as $177,250 last summer. Police say that instead of
telling the bank, they withdrew the money, quit their jobs and moved to
Florida.
They were buying a house in the Orlando area when the mistake was traced.
Randy
Pratt told the Bloomsburg Press Enterprise he did attempt to ask the
bank what happened, but was ignored. He said he considered the money "a
gift from God."
The couple gave away thousands of dollars, including $25,000 to a Florida church shelter for the homeless, he said.
Randy
Pratt remained in county prison. A judge denied a request to lower his
$100,000 bail. Melissa Pratt, who told the court she was estranged from
her husband, was free on unsecured bail.
Jan 19, 2009 | 2:21 PM
Category:
Political
He might not want to remember this photo
It shows him in 2003 at a St. Patrick's Day parade, brandishing a plunger—and it will be on display during his inaugural parade

Before he was even a senator, let alone president-elect, then-unknown
Barack Obama was, at a 2003 St. Patrick's Day parade, a plunger
wrangler. (Photo courtesy Mats Selen)
Take that, Joe the Plumber: Here's evidence that the soon-to-be leader of the free world knows his way around a plunger.
This very unpresidential photo of Barack Obama, blown up to poster size, will be rolling down Pennsylvania
Avenue on Tuesday along with the most unorthodox participants of the
inaugural parade: the World Famous Lawn Rangers, a 28-year-old Central
Illinois-based precision lawn mower drill team.
"We are the whoopee cushion of the parade," declared Ranger veteran Tom Bruno, a member of the Champaign City Council.
Obama met the Rangers in 2003 at Chicago's St. Patrick's Day Parade when he was just launching his bid for the U.S.
Senate. As they joked around, the little-known candidate grabbed one of
the plungers that Ranger leaders use in lieu of batons. Ranger Mats
Selen, a University of Illinois physics professor, snapped a picture, which everybody promptly forgot about until Obama was elected plunger-carrier-in-chief.
Then, on a lark, Ranger founder Pat Monahan of Arcola applied to march
in the inaugural parade, and somebody on the parade committee
apparently had a sense of whimsy.
The 48-mower contingent will include one topped with a 5-foot replica of the Washington Monument,
another with a well-endowed mannequin wearing a T-shirt declaring "D.C.
or bust," and another called "Obama the self-starter." It features two
hands emerging from the mower and grabbing the starter rope.
The group, which calls the new president "Mow-Bama," is selling the photo on T-shirts, aprons and the like at www.zazzle.com/tombruno.
Also available is kitsch with the Ranger inaugural credo: "Bringing dignity back to Washington."
Jan 19, 2009 | 12:35 PM
Category:
News
It's ironic that Barack Obama chooses to infuse these opening days of his presidency with the imagery of Abraham Lincoln.
I don't think there could be two more different men. Understanding why may help us think about what to expect in the days ahead.
Beyond his trademark "change we can believe in," Obama's defining theme
has been unity and inclusiveness. "...There's not a liberal America and
a conservative America -- there's the United States of America....We
worship an awesome God in the Blue States...and have gay friends in the
Red States."
Obama, of course, does not suggest that we don't have differences. His
point is that those differences are not critically important and
they're getting in our way. Let's put differences aside, get practical,
and solve our problems.
The inaugural ceremonies have pastors for everyone. A white evangelical
that opposes same-sex marriage, a white homosexual, a left-wing black
male, and a left-wing black female.
His economic stimulus plan has large government expenditures to please Democrats and tax benefits to please Republicans.
Lincoln, too, sought unity. But Lincoln's notion of where national unity would lie was far different from Obama's.
He prophetically stated the challenge after accepting the Republican nomination for the presidency in 1858.
"A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government
cannot endure half slave and half free. I do not expect the union to be
dissolved. I do not expect the House to fall. But I do expect it will
cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other."
As historian Harry Jaffa points out, "For Lincoln, as for Jefferson and
for all genuine supporters of the principles of the Declaration of
Independence, the distinction between right and wrong is antecedent to
any form of government and is independent of any man's or any
majority's will."
Lincoln knew that some principles are so fundamental they cannot be
compromised. He knew that we couldn't ignore our key differences. Unity
could only come from facing them and making the hard choices.
He knew that even though there were competing religious claims on the
issue of slavery -- some found biblical sanction in it -- we would
still have to choose and decide who we are.
As Americans killed each other, he observed: "Both read the same Bible
and pray to the same God....The prayers of both could not be
answered...."
We have many Americans today who read the same Bible but see the truths
that define this country very differently. And, of course, we have
Americans who do not see the Bible as relevant to those truths at all
and those who would claim that there are no truths.
As Lincoln observed, the prayers of all cannot be answered. Unless
we're resigned to meaninglessness, we must believe that our future will
reflect today's choices.
On the hardest moral dilemma of his day, Abraham Lincoln stepped up to
the plate and took a stand. He did not say that it was above his pay
grade. And this is what makes Abraham Lincoln very different from
Barack Obama.
Each time has its challenges. Americans feel betrayed by what they see
as unethical behavior in American business and in Washington. Yet few
seem to appreciate that moral problems lie at the root of our faltering
economy.
Sanctity of life and sanctity of property are cut from the same cloth of eternal law.
In the view of many, including me, it's this law that defines our free country.
Our new president, who sanctions both abortion and massive government
intrusion into our economic lives, sees things very differently.
So let's not pretend these fundamental differences don't matter. How we
choose will define our future. As Lincoln said, the nation "will become
all one thing, or all the other."
Jan 19, 2009 | 12:34 PM
Category:
Political
It's ironic that Barack Obama chooses to infuse these opening days of his presidency with the imagery of Abraham Lincoln.
I don't think there could be two more different men. Understanding why may help us think about what to expect in the days ahead.
Beyond his trademark "change we can believe in," Obama's defining theme
has been unity and inclusiveness. "...There's not a liberal America and
a conservative America -- there's the United States of America....We
worship an awesome God in the Blue States...and have gay friends in the
Red States."
Obama, of course, does not suggest that we don't have differences. His
point is that those differences are not critically important and
they're getting in our way. Let's put differences aside, get practical,
and solve our problems.
The inaugural ceremonies have pastors for everyone. A white evangelical
that opposes same-sex marriage, a white homosexual, a left-wing black
male, and a left-wing black female.
His economic stimulus plan has large government expenditures to please Democrats and tax benefits to please Republicans.
Lincoln, too, sought unity. But Lincoln's notion of where national unity would lie was far different from Obama's.
He prophetically stated the challenge after accepting the Republican nomination for the presidency in 1858.
"A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government
cannot endure half slave and half free. I do not expect the union to be
dissolved. I do not expect the House to fall. But I do expect it will
cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other."
As historian Harry Jaffa points out, "For Lincoln, as for Jefferson and
for all genuine supporters of the principles of the Declaration of
Independence, the distinction between right and wrong is antecedent to
any form of government and is independent of any man's or any
majority's will."
Lincoln knew that some principles are so fundamental they cannot be
compromised. He knew that we couldn't ignore our key differences. Unity
could only come from facing them and making the hard choices.
He knew that even though there were competing religious claims on the
issue of slavery -- some found biblical sanction in it -- we would
still have to choose and decide who we are.
As Americans killed each other, he observed: "Both read the same Bible
and pray to the same God....The prayers of both could not be
answered...."
We have many Americans today who read the same Bible but see the truths
that define this country very differently. And, of course, we have
Americans who do not see the Bible as relevant to those truths at all
and those who would claim that there are no truths.
As Lincoln observed, the prayers of all cannot be answered. Unless
we're resigned to meaninglessness, we must believe that our future will
reflect today's choices.
On the hardest moral dilemma of his day, Abraham Lincoln stepped up to
the plate and took a stand. He did not say that it was above his pay
grade. And this is what makes Abraham Lincoln very different from
Barack Obama.
Each time has its challenges. Americans feel betrayed by what they see
as unethical behavior in American business and in Washington. Yet few
seem to appreciate that moral problems lie at the root of our faltering
economy.
Sanctity of life and sanctity of property are cut from the same cloth of eternal law.
In the view of many, including me, it's this law that defines our free country.
Our new president, who sanctions both abortion and massive government
intrusion into our economic lives, sees things very differently.
So let's not pretend these fundamental differences don't matter. How we
choose will define our future. As Lincoln said, the nation "will become
all one thing, or all the other."
Jan 19, 2009 | 12:31 PM
Category:
Political
from ABCNewsObama's Inauguration Has Been Financed Partially by Bailed-Out Wall Street Executives
The country is in the middle of the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, which isn't stopping rich donors and the government from spending $170 million, or more, on the inauguration of Barack Obama .
The actual swearing-in ceremony will cost $1.24 million, according to
Carole Florman, spokeswoman for the Joint Congressional Committee on
Inaugural Ceremonies.
It's the security, parties and countless Porta-a-Potty rentals that really run up the bill.
The federal government estimates that it will spend roughly $49
million on the inaugural weekend. Washington, D.C., Virginia and
Maryland have requested another $75 million from the federal government
to help pay for their share of police, fire and medical services.
And then there is the party bill.
"We have a budget of roughly $45 million, maybe a little bit more," said Linda Douglas, spokeswoman for the inaugural committee.
That's more than the $42.3 million in private funds spent by President
Bush's committee in 2005 or the $33 million spent for Bill Clinton's
first inaugural in 1993.
Douglas said that this will be the "most open and accessible
inauguration in history," with members of the general public able to
participate on a greater scale than ever before.
"The
money is going toward providing events which we hope are going to
connect people, make them feel like we are all in this together and
reinforce the notion that when we pull together, we're stronger,"
Douglas said. "And we need to pull together to face the challenges that
are before us today."
Among the expenses: a Bruce Springsteen concert,
the parade, large-screen TV rentals for all-free viewing on the
national Mall, $700,000 to the Smithsonian Institution to stay open
and, of course, the balls, including three that are being pitched as
free or low cost for the public.
But there are plenty of rich donors willing to pick up the tab.
"They are not the $20 and $50 donors who helped propel Obama
through Election Day," said Massie Ritsch, communications director for
the Center for Responsive Politics. "These are people giving mostly
$50,000 apiece. They tend to be corporate executives, celebrities, the
elite of the elite."
Best Seats in the House
The biggest group of donors were none other than the recently bailed-out Wall Street executives and employees.
"The finance sector is well represented, despite its recent troubles,"
Ritsch said. "Those who worked in finance still managed to pull
together nearly $7 million for the inauguration."
The donors will get some of the best seats in the house for the
inauguration, as well as admittance to some of the best balls and other
events.
"I don't think that they're going to get a whole lot of face time with
the new president himself," Ritsch said, "but they are certainly
establishing themselves from day one as his biggest financial
supporters. And if there's something they need or to tell him down the
road, they will have an easier time doing that than everyone else."
Besides Wall Street firms, a large chunk of the money came from
employees at companies such as Microsoft, Google and DreamWorks
Animation, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
Microsoft CEO Steven Ballmer and his wife, Connie, each gave
$50,000. So did Microsoft chairman and co-founder Bill Gates and his
wife, Melinda.
DreamWorks CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg and his wife, Marilyn, each
gave $50,000. Filmmaker and DreamWorks co-founder Steven Spielberg and
his wife, Kate, both also gave $50,000. And DreamWorks employees gave a
total of $275,000.
Billionaire investor George Soros and his family contributed $250,000
to the inauguration, and Google co-founder Larry Page and CEO Eric
Schmidt each donated $25,000.
Other big-name donors who gave $50,000 include filmmaker George
Lucas, artist Dale Chihuly, Los Angeles Dodgers President Jamie
McCourt. Citigroup managing director Raymond J. McGuire; Oracle
President Charles E. Phillips Jr.; actresses Halle Berry and Sharon
Stone; and Melvin Simon, co-founder of Simon Property Group, the
largest mall owner in the United States.
Despite all the donations, Obama's team has made donations much more restrictive than in the past.
Obama capped donations at $50,000 per person, which is still
more than 10 times what individuals could give to his campaign, but a
lot less than the $250,000 cap President Bush had at his last
inauguration. Contributions from corporations, labor unions, political
action committees and registered lobbyists are not being accepted by
Obama.
The Real Money
For Bill Clinton's second inaugural in 1997, contributions were capped
to $100. But that committee had some leftover money from the previous
inauguration and charged people up to $3,000 for inaugural tickets.
"We have the broadest fundraising restrictions in inaugural history," Douglas said.
The inauguration team is also posting all donations of $200 or
more on the Internet almost as quickly as they are coming in. The law
only requires it to disclose the information 90 days after the actual
swearing-in.
"The transparency of this inaugural fundraising effort is unprecedented
as far as we can remember," Ritsch said. "We see that as a positive
step and hope it's an indication that President Obama will use
technology to make government more responsive and transparent to
people."
That's all the play money. The bulk of cash will actually be spent on security and logistics.
In a letter to members of Congress, the governors of Maryland
and Virginia, and the mayor of Washington said that their combined
costs could exceed $75 million. That's on top of the $49 million the
federal government is spending, again mostly for security.
"The historical significance of inaugurating the first
African-American president of the United States alone makes the event
unprecedented," they wrote. "Given its political significance, we
expect that the event will be attended by hundreds, if not thousands,
of elected U.S. government officials and foreign dignitaries. Turnout
by the general public for the swearing-in ceremony alone is likely to
exceed 2 million. Transportation officials estimate that roughly 10,000
charter buses will enter the District with approximately 500,000 riders
alone, a number which nearly matches the city's population."
The emergency managers for the three jurisdictions said they
expect this to be the most complex and challenging inaugural in
history.
"The mass of attendees expected will challenge fire, law
enforcement, emergency medical and mass transit capabilities," the
governors and mayor wrote. "Moreover, the high volume of buses/traffic,
weather factor and other threats will create additional demands."
Jan 19, 2009 | 12:28 PM
Category:
News
from ABCNewsObama's Inauguration Has Been Financed Partially by Bailed-Out Wall Street Executives
The country is in the middle of the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, which isn't stopping rich donors and the government from spending $170 million, or more, on the inauguration of Barack Obama .
The actual swearing-in ceremony will cost $1.24 million, according to
Carole Florman, spokeswoman for the Joint Congressional Committee on
Inaugural Ceremonies.
It's the security, parties and countless Porta-a-Potty rentals that really run up the bill.
The federal government estimates that it will spend roughly $49
million on the inaugural weekend. Washington, D.C., Virginia and
Maryland have requested another $75 million from the federal government
to help pay for their share of police, fire and medical services.
And then there is the party bill.
"We have a budget of roughly $45 million, maybe a little bit more," said Linda Douglas, spokeswoman for the inaugural committee.
That's more than the $42.3 million in private funds spent by President
Bush's committee in 2005 or the $33 million spent for Bill Clinton's
first inaugural in 1993.
Douglas said that this will be the "most open and accessible
inauguration in history," with members of the general public able to
participate on a greater scale than ever before.
"The
money is going toward providing events which we hope are going to
connect people, make them feel like we are all in this together and
reinforce the notion that when we pull together, we're stronger,"
Douglas said. "And we need to pull together to face the challenges that
are before us today."
Among the expenses: a Bruce Springsteen concert,
the parade, large-screen TV rentals for all-free viewing on the
national Mall, $700,000 to the Smithsonian Institution to stay open
and, of course, the balls, including three that are being pitched as
free or low cost for the public.
But there are plenty of rich donors willing to pick up the tab.
"They are not the $20 and $50 donors who helped propel Obama
through Election Day," said Massie Ritsch, communications director for
the Center for Responsive Politics. "These are people giving mostly
$50,000 apiece. They tend to be corporate executives, celebrities, the
elite of the elite."
Best Seats in the House
The biggest group of donors were none other than the recently bailed-out Wall Street executives and employees.
"The finance sector is well represented, despite its recent troubles,"
Ritsch said. "Those who worked in finance still managed to pull
together nearly $7 million for the inauguration."
The donors will get some of the best seats in the house for the
inauguration, as well as admittance to some of the best balls and other
events.
"I don't think that they're going to get a whole lot of face time with
the new president himself," Ritsch said, "but they are certainly
establishing themselves from day one as his biggest financial
supporters. And if there's something they need or to tell him down the
road, they will have an easier time doing that than everyone else."
Besides Wall Street firms, a large chunk of the money came from
employees at companies such as Microsoft, Google and DreamWorks
Animation, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
Microsoft CEO Steven Ballmer and his wife, Connie, each gave
$50,000. So did Microsoft chairman and co-founder Bill Gates and his
wife, Melinda.
DreamWorks CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg and his wife, Marilyn, each
gave $50,000. Filmmaker and DreamWorks co-founder Steven Spielberg and
his wife, Kate, both also gave $50,000. And DreamWorks employees gave a
total of $275,000.
Billionaire investor George Soros and his family contributed $250,000
to the inauguration, and Google co-founder Larry Page and CEO Eric
Schmidt each donated $25,000.
Other big-name donors who gave $50,000 include filmmaker George
Lucas, artist Dale Chihuly, Los Angeles Dodgers President Jamie
McCourt. Citigroup managing director Raymond J. McGuire; Oracle
President Charles E. Phillips Jr.; actresses Halle Berry and Sharon
Stone; and Melvin Simon, co-founder of Simon Property Group, the
largest mall owner in the United States.
Despite all the donations, Obama's team has made donations much more restrictive than in the past.
Obama capped donations at $50,000 per person, which is still
more than 10 times what individuals could give to his campaign, but a
lot less than the $250,000 cap President Bush had at his last
inauguration. Contributions from corporations, labor unions, political
action committees and registered lobbyists are not being accepted by
Obama.
The Real Money
For Bill Clinton's second inaugural in 1997, contributions were capped
to $100. But that committee had some leftover money from the previous
inauguration and charged people up to $3,000 for inaugural tickets.
"We have the broadest fundraising restrictions in inaugural history," Douglas said.
The inauguration team is also posting all donations of $200 or
more on the Internet almost as quickly as they are coming in. The law
only requires it to disclose the information 90 days after the actual
swearing-in.
"The transparency of this inaugural fundraising effort is unprecedented
as far as we can remember," Ritsch said. "We see that as a positive
step and hope it's an indication that President Obama will use
technology to make government more responsive and transparent to
people."
That's all the play money. The bulk of cash will actually be spent on security and logistics.
In a letter to members of Congress, the governors of Maryland
and Virginia, and the mayor of Washington said that their combined
costs could exceed $75 million. That's on top of the $49 million the
federal government is spending, again mostly for security.
"The historical significance of inaugurating the first
African-American president of the United States alone makes the event
unprecedented," they wrote. "Given its political significance, we
expect that the event will be attended by hundreds, if not thousands,
of elected U.S. government officials and foreign dignitaries. Turnout
by the general public for the swearing-in ceremony alone is likely to
exceed 2 million. Transportation officials estimate that roughly 10,000
charter buses will enter the District with approximately 500,000 riders
alone, a number which nearly matches the city's population."
The emergency managers for the three jurisdictions said they
expect this to be the most complex and challenging inaugural in
history.
"The mass of attendees expected will challenge fire, law
enforcement, emergency medical and mass transit capabilities," the
governors and mayor wrote. "Moreover, the high volume of buses/traffic,
weather factor and other threats will create additional demands."